Trump Rejects $600 Relief Bill, Demands $2,000 Stimulus Checks for Americans
During a surprise holiday twist, President Trump turned Congress upside down by flat-out refusing a $900 billion virus relief bill, saying Americans need fatter stimulus checks than $600 to keep their heads above water.
Presidential Pushback on “Ridiculously Low” Payments
In a twinkling tweet, Trump blasted the measure from a snowy White House, calling the $600 checks “a disgrace” and warning lawmakers to make the payments $2,000 for individuals, $4,000 for married couples, or face a holiday mess. His holiday bombshell came only days before Christmas, the same day the bipartisan team had finally, tooth-dully, agreed on the haggled plan, and the order scrambled days of negotiations like holiday dinner spilled on the table.
“Congress should change the bill and boost the $600 to $2,000 or $4,000 for couples,” he said in the tweet and a blinkin’-video snapshot. Trump’s surprise take last week handed momentum to House Democrats, the only card in the deck who had long shoved for fatter payments, yet had faced a Senate led by Republicans who were stubborn the Senate was a Senate who were stubborn the Senate was stubborn.
Congressional Response and Market Confusion
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi hopped on Trump’s surprise push for bigger checks right away, tweeting: “Republicans kept dodging on what the President wanted for direct payments. Finally, he’s on board for $2,000—Democrats are ready to bring it to the Floor this week by unanimous consent.”
That last-minute change threw the economy right back into gear and crowded the relief package yesterday, the stay-at-home order of Americans. A bill that managered to line way too many months of fierce back and forth passed both chambers by mile, 359 to 53 in the House and 92 to 6 in the Senate. Treasury Secretary Mnuchin, for his part, insisted money could “already start hitting bank accounts by the beginning of next week.”
Foreign Funding and Government Funding Clutter
Instead of granting the glad confusion, the President muddied waters he muddied the bill tying the payments to the broader $1.4 trillion budget package, warning Congress on foreign assistance and spending he said wasted tax dollars in the regular funding plan.
“The package is way too big away from the Americans,” Trump wrote, then ticked off foreign funding and American spending programs he wanted to cut. His aides, meanwhile, were said to have closed the eyes when the President went to the camera and handed off blame against the deal they got aide-Y and the administration he and they they.
Potential Consequences of Presidential Inaction
If the President continues delaying action on the relief bill, the fallout could be severe:
– Emergency aid could drop for the millions still without work.
– Protections keeping families in their homes may end just as winter temperatures drop.
– A gap in funding could force the federal government to close some offices.
– Money for urgently needed vaccine supplies could be held up.
– Small businesses keeping their doors open today may be pushed deeper into trouble.
Path Forward Amid Political Brinkmanship
Trump spent the holiday break at Mar-a-Lago, returning the pressure to Capitol Hill. Democrats looked to file a quick vote for a stand-alone $2,000 relief check. One single Senator could slow, or even sink, the move. Lawmakers, at the same time, were weighing whether to post a two-thirds override to any veto, reasoning that the bill had passed on solid bipartisan votes before leaving for the recess. The tense showdown revealed the **volatile atmosphere** in the capital, with voters suffering under an economic strain already worsened by the pandemic that has claimed so many lives.
FAQs
What caused Trump to turn on the emergency package?
Trump labeled the $600 benefit response a “tiny” assist, insisting families needed $2,000.
Did the President’s advisers believe in the proposal?
His Treasury Secretary, Mnuchin, sold the relief as a smart deal and defended it on camera.
So what if the President doesn’t sign the bill?
The clock keeps ticking and that could mean bad news: folks running out of cash could lose the extra unemployment check, no more protection from being kicked out of their homes, and all the agencies that pay our teachers, firefighters, and road crew suddenly run out of cash.
Are Dems on board with the bigger cash payments?
You bet! The moment the President went on TV and said the $600 checks were unfair, the Democrats jumped right on the bandwagon, shouting from every microphone that the extra $1,400 would help.
IRS $1,433 Stimulus Check Update Find Out If You’re Eligible to Get Payment This Week